Remember to send us your questions and comments to our Twitter account:@redinskala where you can find more information and security tips. February 2014 at 16:59 Having this same problem this morning and the Domain IS valid. When we study the structure of this new set of codes we can appreciate its versatility and the way it can extend the earlier codes. Because of limitations in the SMTP code design, these are not suitable for use in delivery status notifications. http://phabletkeyboards.com/error-codes/smtp-protocol-error-codes.php
Blogroll Blackberry Expert Support Center Blackberry Support Forum Dexion Services AG Kerio Connect Forum Recent CommentsMani on Blackberry OS 10: How to mute the dial pad on the phoneKenny Chu on The sender can’t do anything to resolve this problem. Modern implementations SHOULD NOT advertise mechanisms that are not permitted due to lack of encryption, unless an encryption layer of sufficient strength is currently being employed. [RFC4954] (Standards Track) R. This feature is known as DSN (Delivery Status Notification) codes.
Reply himanshu n/a Points 2015-10-22 3:22 am Hi Thanks for responce. This is useful only as a permanent error. Vaudreuil IESG X.1.0 Other address status Not given Something about the address specified in the message caused this DSN. [RFC3463] (Standards Track) G.
As specified in [RFC3463], an enhanced status code consists of a three-part code, with each part being numeric and separated by a period character. If possible, the code for the actual problem found when delivery was attempted should be returned rather than this code. 3.6 Mail Delivery Protocol Status X.5.0 Other or undefined protocol status Vaudreuil Request for Comments: 3463 Lucent Technologies Obsoletes: 1893 January 2003 Category: Standards Track Enhanced Mail System Status Codes Status of this Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol Smtp Codes 240 This is useful only as a permanent error.
For the remaining recipients rejected by this error, the mail is still under the responsibility of the SMTP Client so the mail should be queued to retry the delivery for the Smtp Status Codes 240 November 2013 at 12:52 This means that the domain of the sender address does not exist. This may be useful as a permanent, transient persistent, or successful delivery code. [RFC3463] (Standards Track) G. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/256321 Example: 4.4.2, status=deferred (lost connection with xx.xx.xx.xx[xx.xx.xx.xx] while sending end of data -- message may be sent more than once) 4.4.2, status=deferred (lost connection with xx.xx.xx.xx[xx.xx.xx.xx] while sending message body) 4.4.2,
Change Controller: The identity of the change controller for the specification. Enhanced Status Code Transport Rule x.1.x Codes X.1.0 - Other address status X.1.1 - Bad destination mailbox address X.1.2 - Bad destination system address X.1.3 - Bad destination mailbox address syntax X.1.4 - Destination mailbox address Example: 4.4.3, status=deferred (Host or domain name not found. Browse Questions Ask a Question Current Customers Chat: Click to Chat Now E-mail: [email protected] Call: 888-321-HOST (4678) Ticket: Submit a Support Ticket Not a Customer?
The SMTP theory of reply codes are partitioned in the number space in such a manner that the remaining available codes will not provide the space needed. This may be useful as a permanent or persistent temporary notification. [RFC3463] (Standards Track) G. Smtp Reply Codes The listing helps me explain better to users. Smtp Error Codes 550 This can apply to any field in the address.
greetings from Argentina. his comment is here Regards, Arnel C. X.6.2 Conversion required and prohibited The content of the message must be converted before it can be delivered and such conversion is not permitted. June 2014 at 15:03  2.0.0 bye is not an error. Enhanced Status Code Exchange 2010
When I ran a WHOIS , traceroute, or ping, it would not recognize the domain. Sending batch emails 5: Keeping contacts up to date The API Demo Page Interfaces API Endpoints List Customers & Administrators Contacts, Lists and Segments Email Campaigns and Launches Exporting Contact and Example: 500 5.5.2 Error: bad syntax 502 5.5.2 Error: command not recognized 504 5.5.2 <..>: Helo command rejected: need fully-qualified hostname 504 5.5.2 : Sender address rejected: need fully-qualified address 504 this contact form Vaudreuil IESG X.3.5 System incorrectly configured Not given The system is not configured in a manner that will permit it to accept this message. [RFC3463] (Standards Track) G.
X.6.1 Media not supported The media of the message is not supported by either the delivery protocol or the next system in the forwarding path. Smtp Error Codes Rfc Security Considerations ......................................13 Appendix A - Collected Status Codes ..........................14 Appendix B - Changes from RFC1893 ............................15 Author's Address .............................................15 Full Copyright Statement .....................................16 Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 3463 These errors can generally be corrected by the sender and retried. [RFC3463] (Standards track) G.
X.7.7 Message integrity failure A transport system otherwise authorized to validate a message was unable to do so because the message was corrupted or altered. System specific errors and diagnostics should be carried by means other than status codes. X.2.4 Mailing list expansion problem X.3.0 Other or undefined mail system status X.3.1 Mail system full X.3.2 System not accepting network messages X.3.3 System not capable of selected features X.3.4 Message Smtp Code 334 Hansen & Klensin Best Current Practice [Page 4] RFC 5248 SMTP Enhanced Status Code Registry June 2008 2.4.
This code is useful for both permanent and transient errors. Vaudreuil IESG X.7.5 Cryptographic failure Not given A transport system otherwise authorized to validate or decrypt a message in transport was unable to do so because necessary information such as key Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 13] RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 Appendix A - Collected Status Codes X.1.0 Other address status X.1.1 Bad destination mailbox address X.1.2 Bad navigate here The general semantics implies that the recipient can delete messages to make more space available.
Your mail will eventually be delivered. The SMTP Enhanced Status Codes registry will have three tables: o Class Sub-Codes Each of the entries in this table represent class sub-codes and all have an unspecified subject sub-code and Status Code Group Group Name Description 1xx Informational Request received, continuing process 2xx Success The action was successfully received, understood, and accepted 3xx Redirection Further action must be taken in order April 2013 at 13:41 You can ignore this error.
In addition, this document adds several codes to the registry that were established by various internet drafts and have come into common use, despite the expiration of the documents themselves. These codes report failures due to translation, transcoding, or otherwise unsupported message media. The following is an extract from RFC 3463, where a definition for this new SMTP Protocol feature is given: SMTP error codes have historically been used for reporting mail system Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 11] RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 X.6.5 Conversion Failed A conversion was required but was unsuccessful.
X.6.4 Conversion with loss performed This is a warning sent to the sender when message delivery was successfully but when the delivery required a conversion in which some data was lost. If you have any further questions, please let us know. Vaudreuil IESG X.1.YYY Addressing Status The address status reports on the originator or destination address. Check out these other articles: Bounce Management Overview Viewing Bounce Reports How to Keep Your Email Lists Sparkling Clean Need more?