Home > Snmp Error > Snmp Error # 223 Prtg

Snmp Error # 223 Prtg

Learn more Top Tags 5804× prtg 1858× snmp 1476× sensor 948× wmi 628× notifications 478× maps View all Tags Fixing SNMP error # 223 by extending OID Votes:0 Your Vote: I don't believe there are any ACLs between devices on the same subnet - and even if there were, is it possible for it to restrict what OIDs could be polled? Add comment Created on Apr 25, 2016 8:03:30 AM by Torsten Lindner [Paessler Support] Permalink 6 Replies Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down Hello, Thank you very much for your KB-Post. Looking very carefully at the SNMPwalk, I see that most of the ifXTable is OK, except that 1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.10 is completely missing. navigate here

The problem comes when I try to monitor the disk usage with the SNMP Linux Free Disk sensor, it returns "no such instance (SNMP error #223)", it happens to all the Test 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0: value=Raven XE EV-DO # Test 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0: value=130388 # Test 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.4.0: value= # Test 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.5.0: value= # Test 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.6.0: value=No response (check: firewalls, routing, snmp settings of device, IPs, SNMP Use at your own risk. Any ideas on why could this be happening? https://kb.paessler.com/en/topic/59631-no-such-instance-snmp-error-223

Before applying any instructions please exercise proper system administrator housekeeping. When I conduct a Walk on 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.473.1.3.6.1.4 for either a host that is in error or not I get the proper response: Paessler SNMP Tester 5.2.3 Computername: PRTGPROBENWAE01 Interface: (10.76.224.84) 6/17/2016 Find out how you can reduce cost, increase QoS and ease planning, as well. greetings Fraggles prtg snmp snmp-error#223 Created on Apr 22, 2016 8:00:38 AM by Fraggles (0) ●1 Permalink Best Answer Accepted Answer Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down It seems that the interface

  1. You are invited to get involved by asking and answering questions!
  2. Add comment Created on Oct 26, 2010 2:37:05 PM by Torsten Lindner [Paessler Support] Permalink Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down Is there any access-list active on the switch / device?
  3. Find out how you can reduce cost, increase QoS and ease planning, as well.

I suspect that this is a bug in the SNMP Agent implementation, it could be that the "table" is only generated after a specific query (for instance walk which is a Before applying any instructions please exercise proper system administrator housekeeping. Please check on the same with the vendor in case. I do get a correct value if I do an snmp walk using an snmp tester, but get the same error if I simple try to poll the oid. (this does

Learn more Top Tags 5804× prtg 1858× snmp 1476× sensor 948× wmi 628× notifications 478× maps View all Tags No such instance (SNMP error 223) after reboot of Dell Poweredge You must make sure that a proper backup of all your data is available. © 1998 - 2016 Paessler AG Solutions • Imprint • Contact • Sitemap • Privacy Policy • Find out how you can reduce cost, increase QoS and ease planning, as well. Regards.

Before applying any instructions please exercise proper system administrator housekeeping. Add comment Created on Dec 14, 2011 12:59:08 PM by sasha2002 (0) Permalink Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down If the sensor works but then later on ceases to work with the Test 1:06:00.0 (1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.6.1,1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.10.1): in=110772312 out=No such instance (SNMP error # 223) Test 2:08:00.0 (1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.6.2,1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.10.2): in=1185681122 out=No such instance (SNMP error # 223) Test 3:26:04.0 (1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.6.3,1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.10.3): in=1185407148 out=No such instance (SNMP error Use at your own risk.

I'm afraid then there is very little we can do. https://kb.paessler.com/en/topic/70048-no-such-instance-snmp-error-223-after-reboot-of-windows-server ESXi 5.1 Update 01 Build Number: 1065491 Best regards Kevin DORRELL Add comment Created on May 6, 2013 9:56:32 AM by dorreke (0) ●1 Permalink Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down Hello, This indexing method ensures that PIM entries are properly related to its parent peripheral gateway and to the appropriate instance. Add comment Created on Jul 14, 2016 6:30:03 AM by SvenVR73 (0) ●1 Permalink Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down Hello, We have the same issue with this sensor on two of

Did you already try to scan for available interfaces using our free SNMP tester http://www.paessler.com/tools/snmptester Add comment Created on May 6, 2013 7:26:42 AM by Aurelio Lombardi [Paessler Support] Last change check over here Add comment Created on Jul 29, 2016 6:07:19 AM by klmj (0) Last change on Jul 29, 2016 8:09:25 AM by Luciano Lingnau [Paessler Support] Permalink Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down Add comment Created on Oct 26, 2010 2:42:17 PM by Getronics Belgium (50) ●1 ●1 Permalink Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down I also have this issue. Learn more Top Tags 5804× prtg 1858× snmp 1476× sensor 948× wmi 628× notifications 478× maps View all Tags No such instance (SNMP error #223) Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down

All objects in this table are read-only to the management station. Before applying any instructions please exercise proper system administrator housekeeping. Disclaimer: The information in the Paessler Knowledge Base comes without warranty of any kind. http://phabletkeyboards.com/snmp-error/snmp-error-2003-prtg.php There may be one or more PIM entries associated with a single peripheral gateway entry.

What do you think? Add comment Created on Apr 22, 2016 12:38:39 PM by Fraggles (0) ●1 Permalink Accepted Answer Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down It seems that the interface numbers did change. Best regards Kevin DORRELL Add comment Created on May 6, 2013 8:00:38 AM by dorreke (0) ●1 Permalink Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down OK, I have some more information.

Add comment Created on Apr 23, 2012 10:56:03 AM by Patrick Hutter [Paessler Support] (7,144) ●3 ●3 Permalink Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down Ah doh, didn't even notice the .1 -

Since PIMs can only be configured while the enterprise contact center application is stopped, PIM table entries cannot be added to or deleted from the table either by the agent or Everything's ok until then. Are you polling from the same IP / management range ? But later it says: Testing standard interfaces...

This is very unusual. I have another 21 ESX hosts that seem to be behaving correctly, but the server team upgraded this one a couple of weeks ago, and since then I cannot read the Use at your own risk. weblink For the current already "broken" sensors, you can manually edit the interface number field (just use the new sensors and copy it from them), to get them working again.

It is the ESX host itself that I am trying to monitor. Find out how you can reduce cost, increase QoS and ease planning, as well. Add comment Created on Jun 20, 2016 6:41:46 PM by mtknepper (0) ●1 Last change on Jun 21, 2016 9:17:31 AM by Luciano Lingnau [Paessler Support] Permalink Votes:0 Your Vote: Up You might want to contact dell to discuss your case.

Disclaimer: The information in the Paessler Knowledge Base comes without warranty of any kind. Learn more Top Tags 5804× prtg 1858× snmp 1476× sensor 948× wmi 628× notifications 478× maps View all Tags Trouble with SNMP traffic sensors Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down This What's the result/outcome? I guess the ".0" has something to do with the data type returned. ----------------------- New Test ----------------------- Paessler SNMP Tester 5.2.3 15.07.2016 09:57:04 (8 ms) : Device: x.x.x.x 15.07.2016 09:57:04 (11

Its just annoying in the error overview to have all these ports (also on some other switches) shown up. Deleting the sensor and recreating the sensor solves the problem. The oid is for a cisco voice gateway to monitor active calls. When I get the list of interfaces, they are all there and I select the ones I am interested in.

Add comment Created on Jun 10, 2016 12:20:01 PM by Jochen Greger [Paessler Support] Last change on Jun 10, 2016 12:20:25 PM by Jochen Greger [Paessler Support] Permalink Votes:0 Your Vote: Can you please re-add the sensors for a test? I have a problem with SNMPv2 traffic sensors on interfaces of a VMware server. best regards.

Please make sure it is 1.3.6.1.4.1.232.22.2.3.1.1.1.5.1. Disclaimer: The information in the Paessler Knowledge Base comes without warranty of any kind. Then I spotted that the Walk type request returned a response where the OID had a .0 added to the end. This could have been caused by a device reboot or configuration change on the device.

You are invited to get involved by asking and answering questions! the netsnmp tools)?