Home > Snmp Error > Snmp Error No Such Instance

Snmp Error No Such Instance

Contents

The misbehaving machine only has a slightly different sensor chip, although that never used to be a problem and it'a even supported by the same kernel module. Otherwise the configurations for lm-sensors and snmpd are identical and the output from the 'sensors' command looks fine. For the current already "broken" sensors, you can manually edit the interface number field (just use the new sensors and copy it from them), to get them working again. Closing for now. http://phabletkeyboards.com/snmp-error/snmp-error-223-no-such-instance.php

Polling for thethree instances individually using the snmpget command now predictably results in the following responses: # snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost .1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.9.1.9.0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskPercent.0 = No Such Instance currently exists Before applying any instructions please exercise proper system administrator housekeeping. And here is my MIB: TEST-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN IMPORTS netSnmpExamples FROM NET-SNMP-EXAMPLES-MIB ifIndex FROM RFC1213-MIB OBJECT-TYPE, Integer32, IpAddress,Counter64,enterprises, MODULE-IDENTITY FROM SNMPv2-SMI DisplayString, MacAddress, TruthValue FROM SNMPv2-TC; testMIB MODULE-IDENTITY LAST-UPDATED "200205290000Z" So if we */ /* get this error with SNMPv1, we fix the PDU by removing the bad variable and retry the request. */ ... https://kb.paessler.com/en/topic/59631-no-such-instance-snmp-error-223

Nosuchinstance Snmp

Its just annoying in the error overview to have all these ports (also on some other switches) shown up. Terms Privacy Opt Out Choices Advertise Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News. Add comment Created on Dec 18, 2013 2:18:57 PM by Patrick Hutter [Paessler Support] (7,144) ●3 ●3 Permalink Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down I got the following error "No such instance Review method of getting info by zabbix via SNMP, or give possibility to select it - cannot get info from some devices after upgrade!

  1. But Lotus/Windows seems to leave out all data from the other OIDs in the response.
  2. Please try again: Please enter the words to the right: Please enter the numbers you hear: Additional Comments (optional) Type your comment here (1000 character limit)...
  3. Hide Permalink Aleksandrs Saveljevs added a comment - 2016 May 24 12:11 Fixed in development branch svn://svn.zabbix.com/branches/dev/ZBX-8096 .
  4. Show Oleksiy Zagorskyi added a comment - 2016 May 18 16:49 Issue summary/description updated to reflect actual figured out problem.

Show Aleksandrs Saveljevs added a comment - 2016 May 24 12:11 Fixed in development branch svn://svn.zabbix.com/branches/dev/ZBX-8096 . best regards. As soon as I add the Lotus Domino template, which has some OIDs that might not (yet) be present on that Lotus server, everything stops working. Snmp Error Codes Add comment Your answer Attachments: Up to 2 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 524.3 kB each and 1.0 MB total.

No, thanks In SNMPv1, the whole PDU is rejected and "response->errindex" is set to indicate */ /* the bad variable. My environment Ubuntu 12.04, Mysql, zabbix from official repo Show Ray added a comment - 2014 May 07 15:06 - edited I have the same problem too, everything was working fine Hide Permalink Ray added a comment - 2014 May 07 15:06 - edited I have the same problem too, everything was working fine with previous version of zabbix.

Before the upgrade it did this: ~# snmpget -v2c -c public .1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.13.16.3.1.1.4 LM-SENSORS-MIB::lmFanSensorsIndex.4 = INTEGER: 3 Now it does this: ~# snmpget -v2c -c public .1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.13.16.3.1.1.4 LM-SENSORS-MIB::lmFanSensorsIndex.4 = No Snmp No Such Object The pcap file has been created this way: tcpdump -s0 -n 'port 161 and (host sg300-1 or host patton2291)' -w zabbix223.pcap sg300-1 = 192.168.0.251 (Cisco SMB switch, SNMPv2) patton2291 = 192.168.14.3 Anyone else experiencing similar behaviour?Here are two queries, a couple of minutes apart:$ snmpwalk -v 2c -c community hostname ifdescrIF-MIB::ifDescr No Such Instance currently exists at this OID$ snmpwalk -v 2c You must make sure that a proper backup of all your data is available. © 1998 - 2016 Paessler AG Solutions • Imprint • Contact • Sitemap • Privacy Policy •

Prtg Snmp Error # -2003

I understand that I can withdraw my consent at any time. http://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/9000/900/sol9937 I took a look at the Lotus SNMP implementation guide and found out that it's daemon only does SNMPv1. Nosuchinstance Snmp Incorrect answer. Snmpget No Such Instance Currently Exists At This Oid Add comment Created on Mar 30, 2012 1:30:23 PM by Torsten Lindner [Paessler Support] Permalink Please log in or register to enter your reply.

The packets that follow say the same about the other OIDs in the list. http://phabletkeyboards.com/snmp-error/snmp-information-snmp-error.php And here is my > MIB: [SNIP/] > memoryUsage OBJECT-TYPE > SYNTAX DisplayString > MAX-ACCESS read-only > STATUS current > DESCRIPTION > "This attribute shall indicate the > usage rate of Answer by Damien Dallimore [Splunk] Jul 08, 2013 at 08:01 AM Comment 10 |10000 characters needed characters left 0 Hi, my local [email protected]_ta: [snmp://fortigate_A_FORTINET-CORE-MIB_query] communitystring = forti destination = x.x.x.x do_bulk_get As soon as I have some spare time I'll try to dig further. Prtg Snmperr_no_vars

As soon as I add the Lotus Domino template, which has some OIDs that might not (yet) be present on that Lotus server, everything stops working. I'm not an expert on SNMP but shouldn't this request use GetBulk instead of GetRequest? 172.xxx.xxx.33.37282 > 172.xxx.xxx.53.161: [bad udp cksum 0x5c2f -> 0xe6fa!] { SNMPv2c C=public { GetRequest(128) R=963109867 .1.3.6.1.4.1.334.72.1.1.4.34.0 Please see what happens, if you remove it and perform the walk again. his comment is here I have NET-SNMP 5.4.1 installed.

So I think we might need a per host switch that allows us to disable bulk requests for that device, because in my case Windows refuses to give any data at "snmp Error # -2003" So I just went ahead and converted the Lotus template to use the SNMPv1 agent. I.e.

Wrong Settings: object_names = 1.3.6.1.4.1.12356.101.4.1.3 object_names = 1.3.6.1.4.1.12356.101.4.1.3 Good Settings: object_names = 1.3.6.1.4.1.12356.101.4.1.3.0 object_names = 1.3.6.1.4.1.12356.101.4.1.3.0 You need to add an ".0" string to end of your query and all it

else if (STAT_SUCCESS == status && SNMP_ERR_NOSUCHNAME == response->errstat && 0 != response->errindex && ITEM_TYPE_SNMPv1 == items[0].type) { /* If a request PDU contains a bad variable, the specified behavior is Add comment Created on Sep 23, 2014 8:42:05 AM by Patrick Hutter [Paessler Support] (7,144) ●3 ●3 Permalink Please log in or register to enter your reply. At least I have not noticed any irregularities in Zabbix operation based on traffic. Snmpd.conf Example Contributors of all backgrounds and levels of expertise come here to find solutions to their issues, and to help other users in the Splunk community with their own questions.

Please give me some time to check it. So if we */ /* get this error with SNMPv1, we fix the PDU by removing the bad variable and retry the request. */ ... When there is dead mail the OID becomes available and filled correctly. weblink Whether that is standards conformant or not, Zabbix should be able to monitor such agents and it seems to be as simple as removing the check for SNMPv1 above.

Hide Permalink Andris Zeila added a comment - 2016 May 27 15:29 Successfully tested Show Andris Zeila added a comment - 2016 May 27 15:29 Successfully tested Hide Permalink Aleksandrs Saveljevs Please don't fill out this field. And in PRTG both the library scan and the individual OIDs work (with SNMP Custom Sensors)? What does your SNMP configuration in Splunk look like (in the inputs.conf file) ?

You are invited to get involved by asking and answering questions! Logging is back to minimal. All other devices is fine. Learn more Top Tags 5804× prtg 1858× snmp 1476× sensor 948× wmi 628× notifications 478× maps View all Tags No such instance (SNMP error #223) Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down

You are invited to get involved by asking and answering questions! I have 4 SNMP OID's on monitoring (soft switch MERA MVTS3G), and "unsupported" is rotated in cycle, i.e. Hide Permalink Strategist added a comment - 2015 Oct 21 13:21 - edited I have this problem now on zabbix 2.2.10, before upgrade from 2.0.14 to 2.2.10 all worked fine Show Add comment Created on Sep 22, 2014 3:35:12 PM by Patrick Hutter [Paessler Support] (7,144) ●3 ●3 Permalink Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down As mentioned in the original post, doing a

Hide Permalink Cristian Mammoli added a comment - 2014 Apr 16 11:37 Actually I downgraded to 2.2.2. After upgrading to 2.2.3 I started noticing lots of the following errors in the console log: SNMP error: (noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB on some devices The oid is for a cisco voice gateway to monitor active calls. Just to check, is this a library scan?

Some details to be more clear: SNMP_ERR_NOSUCHNAME error is related to snmp, say, error-status "packet header" and may be related mostly to SNMPv1, but now it's known fact that it may However, the behavior of Lotus described by Tobias is unexpected, where SNMPv2 agent behaves like SNMPv1. Have you changed request type in 2.2.3? Disclaimer: The information in the Paessler Knowledge Base comes without warranty of any kind.

Before this date they also were scanned without any issues.