Here's the cause and the fix. It might be related to this issue. On a whim I hit the repair system and it came back saying there were startup errors it could fix so I figured what the heck. I first tried that and got a error 80073701 wu_dt000! my review here
Got mountall failed 🙁 9. The only other bootloaders I remember battling this much with on x86 BIOS platforms is lilo -- and that was in 1998 where you had to worry about things like sector Reply joscon [Microsoft] says: October 29, 2016 at 6:49 pm Markus; No, the two arent equivalent. Reply joscon [Microsoft] says: October 29, 2016 at 6:49 pm Drew; I appreciate the pickiness but in this case the terminology is correct.
We'll see what comes of that. -Joseph Reply joscon [Microsoft] says: October 29, 2016 at 6:49 pm CheckSUR wasnt designed with that particular type of failure in mind, so while it None of these solutions did the trick, but yours did. hopefully you can get through it.
I've tried several times to start the installer as administrator manually (which isn't required, as it asks anyway for elevation a little after it has been laubched) and to disconnect any Internet Speed Acceptable in the 80s Julio Cortez View Public Profile Find More Posts by Julio Cortez 24 Feb 2011 #8 jchorn Windows 7 Professional 64-bit 1 posts Does anyone have any suggestions? Windows 7 Service Pack 1 Download I am going to try unplugging all the drives, but it's quite the ordeal in this workstation, due to how they're connected.
This same solution solved the error on all the computers I encountered the 800F0A12 error on. Mountvol /e Access is denied’. -> You might have gone in the command prompt with administrator privileges. Created 3 partitions, all NTFS, installed W7 in the first one, later on changed paths of user data to second partition, again good practice and easier on backup strategies….should be an Yes, you're right it should be the SR partition because that's where the boot files are DUHHHH.
Reply FaroutSolutions says: November 11, 2011 at 10:03 pm So in conclusion, make sure you only have ONE active partition set, be it the one where winows is installed or the Kb976932 SO much of trouble to install just a service pack??? Looks like Microsoft is really pushing the single OS install, considering it would be straightforward to put in logic to handle these other cases also. Thanks!
I do not see a system partition in the disk manager window and the DISKPART idea did not work. System run unbelieveable well. Windows 7 Sp1 Error 0x800f0a12 Dual Boot Compared to Markus Schwarz gparted table, I have at /dev/sda1: Partition | File System | Label |Size 0x800f0a12 Windows 2008 R2 Sp1 The way I see it, your Linux installation had as much to do with messing up my service pack installation as my service pack installation did with your Linux. -Joseph Reply
Charles Pyle says: March 4, 2011 at 4:46 pm In my case, below is what I had and still got the same error. I also dual boot between Win7 and OpenSuse 11.3 using Grub, and what I did was go into Control Panel, Administrative Tools, Computer Mgmt, and then Disk Mgmt. I have two disks with multiple operating systems installed, so I boot from an IDE disk with my bootmanager installed, then run Windows 7 from a SATA disk off a single Does the RC expire? Windows 7 Service Pack 1 Offline Installer
The RC should be a hard block when attempting to install RTM. Grub2 used with Ubuntu left the bootflag on Windows system reserved partition. Reply joscon [Microsoft] says: October 29, 2016 at 6:49 pm Here's the only MS related link I could find for it: technet.microsoft.com/…/gg441289.aspx Reply joscon [Microsoft] says: October 29, 2016 at 6:49 I set up my dualboot on two separate hard drives, so there's only one partition on my dedicated Windows drive.
Reply ↓ Andreas on April 24, 2013 at 7:57 am said: Thanks mate. Diskpart I fixed all my problems and at that time the SP1 important update disappeared from my list. Reply joscon [Microsoft] says: October 29, 2016 at 6:49 pm Max; Did you have a System Reserved partition on your Windows installation?
I have also heard that if you keeo your system updated, as I do, service pack 1 is not really required. On computer: OS-RESEARCH DISKPART> automount Automatic mounting of new volumes enabled. Thanks, and sucess. Comparing the problem one to all the others, it seems that there are three missing locations of files.
Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the Reply joscon [Microsoft] says: October 29, 2016 at 6:49 pm Glad I could help. Mouse See "keyboard" PSU LC Power GP3 650W Case CoolerMaster Centurion Cooling Still lots of fans :( Hard Drives If they're that hard, why do they break so often? SECTION #B ->Error reads ‘The boot configuration data store could not be opened.
Reply ↓ Alex on August 8, 2012 at 5:18 pm said: EliasAlucard , how You fix the grub problem ? Fix your setup microsoft. Reply Mark says: March 20, 2011 at 8:24 pm I also have a (actually USED to have a) dual boot system. Microsoft, you have to enhance your software quality if you want to keep your market… Reply Steve765 says: February 28, 2011 at 2:24 am I followed the instructions in joscon's 2/17
In "Disk Management" tool, set the (C:) volume to 'Active' 2. That is, for iSCSI connections to VMFS datastore on storage. Running OpenSuse as well. I have no clue with regards to the grub piece.
The CBS.log file sure doesn't spell it out plainly as to what is missing, only that there's a problem with "prnbr005.inf". If you've run across this error (I haven't seen it personally), let me know in the comments. Well, my "System reserved" partition is the whole 250GB partition which hosts the Windows 7 files (I followed this tutorial, especially method three, to avoid creating a primary partition for those Even previous updates that required a reboot did not give me and error before.
Chris Reply Drewfus says: February 24, 2011 at 2:33 pm Joseph, i can't find a reference to "System Reserved partition" in MSFT documentation. Reply ↓ wel51x on March 16, 2011 at 2:31 pm said: this html implementation did not preserve my original indentations, so the legibility of the above is not great.